Saturday, June 07, 2008

Ron Paul for President?


After my last post on the 2008 presidential contenders there were a few comments made about another option for the office of President, congressman Ron Paul.

Here in my area I see a lot of signs, bumper stickers, etc promoting Congressman Paul for President. But to be honest, I really knew very little about him. Who exactly is Ron Paul and would he make a good choice for president? So I decided to let my fingers do the walking and see what Mr Paul was about. Here's some of what I found out.

Before seeking a public office Mr Paul attended and graduated from Duke University School of Medicine. He served his country in the US Air Force as flight surgeon. In the late 60's he began his medical practice in Brazoria County Texas, where he specialized in obstetrics/gynecology and delivered over 4000 babies.

He became a congressman in the 70's thru the early 80's and served on the House Banking committee where he was an advocate for sound monetary policy and a very outspoken critic of the federal reserves inflationary measures. His firm views on limited government were not considered popular in Washington.

Through out his career he has been an unwavering advocate of pro-life and family value issues. He has also consistently voted to lower or abolish federal taxes and spending regulation. He believes in and has actively promoted the return of the government to the proper constitutional levels.

In 1984 he voluntarily gave up his house seat to return to the private sector to practice medicine, then returned to congress in 1997. He now serves on the House Committee on Financial Services and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Through out his life and Congressional career Mr Paul has remained consistent in his beliefs and works tirelessly toward the reduction of government, a return to constitutional principals, lower taxes, free markets and a return to sound monetary policies. His consistent voting record proves this and has prompted some of his colleagues to state : "Ron Paul personifies the Founding Father's ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are.” and “There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few.”

That seems high praise from ones own peers wouldn't you say? So now I have to ask myself why isn't this man someone who's been taken more seriously as a presidential contender? But in asking that question I suppose I already know the answer..... Considering his above strong ideals and beliefs he doesn't seem like a man who would be controlled or swayed for party's sake. And in the real world if you want the backing of the larger parties you have to be willing to not only bend but kiss a little butt while you're down there.


The following is a brief overview of Congressman Paul's record while in office.
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.

I have to say what Ive learned about this man so far I really like him. Now I have to decide if my vote is better used to block Obama,who I'm absolutely sure I do not want to run our country or do I want to vote for a man who I can actually admire and believe in as president?

8 comments:

exMI said...

My biggest problem with Ron Paul is that he espouses the Libertarian Parties idea of a foreign policy. Namely sit at home and ignore the world. Now I have voted Libertarian in the past and will probably do so again, but not for President so long as they maintain this irrational outlook.

(did you mention that he ran for President as a Libertarian once?)

Forzavryheid said...

Hmmmmm... tough one, but the real question you need to ask yourself is this:

Is the election there to be used to vote your preferred candidate IN to power, or there to cast a vote in order to keep a less preferable candidate OUT?

HAPPY VOTING!! : D

Anonymous said...

I knew I could count on you. I have been commenting a lot of places saying that Obama is not my choice, but neither is McCain. This is the kind of politician we need in this country, but will be so pressed to find in mass numbers. I've commented twice this week at "Writes of Spring" saying the obvious.

Basically, people are going to be disappointed when Obama can't part the waters or raise the dead and nothing has changed.

I think this is the first election I can remember since I was able to vote in 1988 that I don't remember actual issues being discussed. Do we know Obama's energy policy and how it differs with McCain's? Do we know either's position on transitioning our economy back to a piece time economy without causing more jobs to be lost?

This is why people say they know little about anything on either candidate because I don't think they know.

And they don't know because they are in such a mad rush to stay in power. So much so thye haven't thought about what they are going to do when they get there.

I wish my vote for Ron Paul would make a difference. However, I voted for Perot in 1992 and look where that got us.

~Jef

Jen said...

exmi
I also dont feel as if ignoring the rest of the world is the way to go. But one thing at a time. First we need to find a person who is competent to run our country.

We require some common sense...a sense of right and wrong. And someone whos interest lies in service to their country over self intersts. Maybe that sort of person doesnt exist.

But maybe at this point it boils down to electing the lesser of the evils.

No in fact I didnt mention that he ran for President as a Libertarian. However after reading about his congressional record and his views on government. I am not at all surprised. He sounds like a Libertarian.


forzavryheid

Good point. And I would say that the most important thing is to vote for the person you feel is the best qualified to do the job.

However...having said that, I am also very aware of the way the game seems to be played. And knowing that I know that Mr Paul probably has very little chance to succeed in winning the office of President.

I do not want Obama winning the office. As long as he and Hillary were clawing and scratching each other...They had the democratic party equally divided. Now that Hillary has stepped down it will clearly be a dog fight between McCain and Obama.

I DO NOT WANT OBAMA AS OUR PRESIDENT! McCain is the only canidate left who has any real chance of winning the White House.

I wish we lived in a world where the best man wins...But thats just not real world politics.

Where is the Supreme Commander of the World when you need one? : )



edge

I like a lot of Ron Pauls thinking and views on government. However its as I said above. I dont see him as a canidate who has a chance to succeed in winning the White House. Unfortunatly.

And if I cast a vote for a man who I think would be a good canidate but has no real chance to win..they does that tip the scales in favor of a man I do not want to win..Obama.

Im not sure McCain is the answer. But I honestly feel if we put Obama in office. We wont just be disapointed hes not the golden boy hes advertised to be.....I think he will do real damage to our country and its people before its over.

If we become complacent and start to think that nothing in front of us could be worse than what we have now...thats exactly the time we are proven wrong.

Just take a look at SA...they thought aparthied the worst evil possible...things can always become worse.

Forzavryheid said...

You might get lucky... as Hillary pointed out, Obama might not make the election! : D

Jen said...

forzavryheid

I agree with the point you made in the previous post about the simple fact hes being taken seriously as a canidate for President sort of rules out the oppressed race card.

It makes a statment about this country and its people and how far things have come. But there are still a great many people who would still like to be "victims of race".

They are the ones who feel they are owed something by the simple fact their ancestors were brought here against their will a few hundred years ago.

Can you imagine what Reverend Wright and others like him would do if Obama was assignated? He would automatically become a martyr and a symbol for their divisive acts. And all those who follow them would feel entitled and justified in anything they did or said to promote that type of behavior and thinking.

No...if he wins the office it wont be good for this country. If he were assignated...that wont be good for this country either. The only alternative at this point is for him to loose the election. AND LOOSE BIG.

Forzavryheid said...

HE WILL LOSE

The US arent as naive as the world media makes out- pissing off the white, christian, blue collar workers and alienating Hillarys supporters (they did boo when she asked them to support Obama the other day after all) will cost him dearly in this race for the White House.

Also, the Republicans dont run election campaigns with kid gloves on, so no doubt theyve been looking into Obamas past with great fervour as he and Hillary battled it out amongst themselves.

Should prove to be interesting, seeing as nobody really knows much about him...

SO DIG G.O.P, DIG!!

Anonymous said...

You're making your mind? You seem to have a very moral and ethic point of view on things. I like that.

You're right voting is an important thing to do.

I don't care about shmolitics, in the sense that....I would not start to give my political point of view, ....and I wouldn't get involved in a party....or run for president. Hehe.

However, I do respect the leaders who have been elected in a non corrupted democratic procedure. They have responsabilities, they wake up early, shave, work hard and have to smile each they cross a camera. I think that these people deserve some respect.

I also think that it is important to make a wise choice when you vote.